Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 25 — Indians · Part 83 · § 83.38

§ 83.38. What options does the petitioner have at the end of the response period on a negative proposed finding?

171 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t25/s§ 83.38·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)At the end of the response period for a negative proposed finding, the petitioner will have 60 days to elect to challenge the proposed finding before an ALJ by sending to the Departmental Cases Hearings Division, Office of Hearings and Appeals, with a copy to OFA a written election of hearing that lists:
(1)Grounds for challenging the proposed finding, including issues of law and issues of material fact; and
(2)The witnesses and exhibits the petitioner intends to present at the hearing, other than solely for impeachment purposes, including:
(i)For each witness listed, his or her name, address, telephone number, and qualifications and a brief narrative summary of his or her expected testimony; and
(ii)For each exhibit listed, a statement confirming that the exhibit is in the administrative record reviewed by OFA or is a previous final determination of a petitioner issued by the Department.
(b)The Department will not consider additional comments or evidence on the proposed finding submitted by individuals or entities during this period.
Connections21 cite this
Cited by 21 sections · top 2
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 83.38
What options does the petitioner have at the end of the response period on a negative proposed finding?
Fed. Reg.×21
Cites 0Cited by 21 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.